Tutti i resoconti
#74988: "A better tutorial feedback system"
awaiting: Questo suggerimento non è stato ancora analizzato dagli sviluppatori
A che riguardo è la segnalazione?
Sito di BGA
Cos'è successo? Prego, seleziona tra le seguenti
Suggerimento: secondo me, fare nel modo seguente migliorerebbe di molto il sito
Descrizione dettagliata
• Spiega il tuo suggerimento in modo preciso e conciso in modo che sia il più semplice possibile per capire cosa intendi.
Game gurus can currently review tutorials in the ALPHA phase (without us having ANY access to their feedback) and only the public can review tutorials in the BETA phase and beyond. Generally the gurus know the game best so it would be good to either:
- Have access to their feedback by having access to their webpage (I've seen the page before)
- Let early testers leave feedback at the end of the tutorial, so tutorial makers can improve their tutorial.
Today I've only had access to what gurus are saying about the tutorial I made recently, but only through a direct message. It would be good to not need to message directly if possible, so comment threads can involve multiple people reviewing.• Qual è il tuo browser?
Mozilla v5
Storico dei resoconti
1º nov 2022 21:21 • 3p1cFr3nzy • Questo suggerimento non è stato ancora analizzato dagli sviluppatori:
For tutorials, they only get promoted to BETA from the ALPHA stage (which is when the public can see them) after they have been reviewed by multiple people, usually around 10 or so. This can be an exception if the developer gets involved and likes the tutorial. Thus, early feedback is vital for the success of a tutorial.
Here is an example of some feedback I could not see from a guru:
snipboard.io/gXdLqK.jpg
This inability to see feedback from gurus spans across all games, and one can only see their comments if they are a guru themselves. To be honest, being a guru in multiple games just for tutorial making is not worth it at all.
The other suggestion would be similar to reviews you normally find online - someone gives a rating together with a comment. Of course, I would suggest complete anonymity for ratings.
Here is an example of some feedback I could not see from a guru:
snipboard.io/gXdLqK.jpg
This inability to see feedback from gurus spans across all games, and one can only see their comments if they are a guru themselves. To be honest, being a guru in multiple games just for tutorial making is not worth it at all.
The other suggestion would be similar to reviews you normally find online - someone gives a rating together with a comment. Of course, I would suggest complete anonymity for ratings.
12 apr 2023 22:33 • nicotacotac • Questo suggerimento non è stato ancora analizzato dagli sviluppatori:
Also, being able to add extra comment to the rating (like for alpha and beta *games* - not tutorial) would be greatly valuable
1º gen 2024 19:06 • lefalaf • Questo suggerimento non è stato ancora analizzato dagli sviluppatori:
I second the ability to comment, optionally, alongside the start rating at the end. There have been plenty of times when I wanted to say something, but didn't feel like bugging the creator directly, assuming I remembered their handle by the end. I feel it would be good to allow the comments, but leave them in a bucket separate from normal DMs that the creator can review at once for a tutorial / tutorials.
22 mar 2025 11:44 • Thomas • Questo suggerimento non è stato ancora analizzato dagli sviluppatori:
I second this. Giving feedback to single steps would help identify the texts. Allowing feedback to have a status (open, rejected, infoneeded, accepted, fixed, reopened) similar to the bug system even allows to see how good a tutorial is.
Aggiungi qualcosa a questo report
Aggiungi qui tutto ciò che sembra pertinente per riprodurre questo bug o capire il tuo suggerimento:
- Un altro ID tavolo / ID mossa
- F5 ha risolto il problema?
- Il problema si verifica spesso? Ogni volta? Casualmente?
- Se hai una schermata di questo errore (cosa buona e giusta), puoi usare Imgur.com per caricarla e fare copia/incolla del link qui.
