#44293: "Bring turn based players back to the table between step 2/3 of Epidemic cards (Rather than after 3)"
A che riguardo è la segnalazione?
Cos'è successo? Prego, seleziona tra le seguenti
Cos'è successo? Prego, seleziona tra le seguenti
Si prega di verificare se esiste già una segnalazione sullo stesso argomento
Se sì, per favore VOTA solo questa segnalazione. Segnalazioni con più voti hanno priorità di presa in carico!
# | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
---|
Descrizione dettagliata
• Per favore copia/incolla il messaggio di errore visualizzato sullo schermo, se possibile.
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
This suggestion is that in a turn-based game the players are called back to the table after step two, but before step three of an Epidemic card being resolved; rather than after step three has been resolved which seems to be the case right now. (i.e. Bring them back at the same timing window as Resilient Population is playable)
This would also mean the players would need to press a confirm button (this functionality could be altered with a player option) so that the game does not automatically advance once the final person views the table.
The new message might look something like the following "A new Epidemic has occurred. The Infection discard pile is about to be shuffled once all players confirm. Resilient Population may be played now (if available). [Confirm]"• Per favore spiega cosa avresti voluto fare, cosa hai fatto e cosa è successo
• Qual è il tuo browser?
Google Chrome v91
• Per favore copia/incolla il testo visualizzato in inglese invece che nella tua lingua. Se hai una schermata di questo errore (cosa buona e giusta), puoi usare Imgur.com per caricarla e fare copia/incolla del link qui.
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
This suggestion is that in a turn-based game the players are called back to the table after step two, but before step three of an Epidemic card being resolved; rather than after step three has been resolved which seems to be the case right now. (i.e. Bring them back at the same timing window as Resilient Population is playable)
This would also mean the players would need to press a confirm button (this functionality could be altered with a player option) so that the game does not automatically advance once the final person views the table.
The new message might look something like the following "A new Epidemic has occurred. The Infection discard pile is about to be shuffled once all players confirm. Resilient Population may be played now (if available). [Confirm]"• Questo testo è disponibile nel sistema di traduzione? Se sì, è stato tradotto nell'arco di più di 24 ore?
• Qual è il tuo browser?
Google Chrome v91
• Spiega il tuo suggerimento in modo preciso e conciso in modo che sia il più semplice possibile per capire cosa intendi.
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
This suggestion is that in a turn-based game the players are called back to the table after step two, but before step three of an Epidemic card being resolved; rather than after step three has been resolved which seems to be the case right now. (i.e. Bring them back at the same timing window as Resilient Population is playable)
This would also mean the players would need to press a confirm button (this functionality could be altered with a player option) so that the game does not automatically advance once the final person views the table.
The new message might look something like the following "A new Epidemic has occurred. The Infection discard pile is about to be shuffled once all players confirm. Resilient Population may be played now (if available). [Confirm]"• Qual è il tuo browser?
Google Chrome v91
• Cosa era mostrato sullo schermo quando sei rimasto bloccato (schermo bianco? interfaccia di gioco parziale? messaggio di errore?)
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
This suggestion is that in a turn-based game the players are called back to the table after step two, but before step three of an Epidemic card being resolved; rather than after step three has been resolved which seems to be the case right now. (i.e. Bring them back at the same timing window as Resilient Population is playable)
This would also mean the players would need to press a confirm button (this functionality could be altered with a player option) so that the game does not automatically advance once the final person views the table.
The new message might look something like the following "A new Epidemic has occurred. The Infection discard pile is about to be shuffled once all players confirm. Resilient Population may be played now (if available). [Confirm]"• Qual è il tuo browser?
Google Chrome v91
• Quale parte delle regole non è stata rispettata dall'adattamento BGA
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
This suggestion is that in a turn-based game the players are called back to the table after step two, but before step three of an Epidemic card being resolved; rather than after step three has been resolved which seems to be the case right now. (i.e. Bring them back at the same timing window as Resilient Population is playable)
This would also mean the players would need to press a confirm button (this functionality could be altered with a player option) so that the game does not automatically advance once the final person views the table.
The new message might look something like the following "A new Epidemic has occurred. The Infection discard pile is about to be shuffled once all players confirm. Resilient Population may be played now (if available). [Confirm]"• La violazione delle regole è visibile nel replay della partita? Se sì, a che numero di mossa?
• Qual è il tuo browser?
Google Chrome v91
• Qual era l'azione di gioco che volevi fare?
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
This suggestion is that in a turn-based game the players are called back to the table after step two, but before step three of an Epidemic card being resolved; rather than after step three has been resolved which seems to be the case right now. (i.e. Bring them back at the same timing window as Resilient Population is playable)
This would also mean the players would need to press a confirm button (this functionality could be altered with a player option) so that the game does not automatically advance once the final person views the table.
The new message might look something like the following "A new Epidemic has occurred. The Infection discard pile is about to be shuffled once all players confirm. Resilient Population may be played now (if available). [Confirm]"• Cosa stai provando a fare per attivare questa azione di gioco?
• Cosa è successo quando hai provato a fare questo (messaggio di errore, messaggio nella barra di stato del gioco...)?
• Qual è il tuo browser?
Google Chrome v91
• In quale fase del gioco si è verificato il problema (qual era l'istruzione della partita in corso)?
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
This suggestion is that in a turn-based game the players are called back to the table after step two, but before step three of an Epidemic card being resolved; rather than after step three has been resolved which seems to be the case right now. (i.e. Bring them back at the same timing window as Resilient Population is playable)
This would also mean the players would need to press a confirm button (this functionality could be altered with a player option) so that the game does not automatically advance once the final person views the table.
The new message might look something like the following "A new Epidemic has occurred. The Infection discard pile is about to be shuffled once all players confirm. Resilient Population may be played now (if available). [Confirm]"• Cosa è successo quando hai provato a fare questa azione di gioco (messaggio di errore, messaggio nella barra di stato del gioco...)?
• Qual è il tuo browser?
Google Chrome v91
• Per favore descrivi il problema rilevato. Se hai una schermata di questo errore (cosa buona e giusta), puoi usare Imgur.com per caricarla e fare copia/incolla del link qui.
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
This suggestion is that in a turn-based game the players are called back to the table after step two, but before step three of an Epidemic card being resolved; rather than after step three has been resolved which seems to be the case right now. (i.e. Bring them back at the same timing window as Resilient Population is playable)
This would also mean the players would need to press a confirm button (this functionality could be altered with a player option) so that the game does not automatically advance once the final person views the table.
The new message might look something like the following "A new Epidemic has occurred. The Infection discard pile is about to be shuffled once all players confirm. Resilient Population may be played now (if available). [Confirm]"• Qual è il tuo browser?
Google Chrome v91
• Per favore copia/incolla il testo visualizzato in inglese invece che nella tua lingua. Se hai una schermata di questo errore (cosa buona e giusta), puoi usare Imgur.com per caricarla e fare copia/incolla del link qui.
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
This suggestion is that in a turn-based game the players are called back to the table after step two, but before step three of an Epidemic card being resolved; rather than after step three has been resolved which seems to be the case right now. (i.e. Bring them back at the same timing window as Resilient Population is playable)
This would also mean the players would need to press a confirm button (this functionality could be altered with a player option) so that the game does not automatically advance once the final person views the table.
The new message might look something like the following "A new Epidemic has occurred. The Infection discard pile is about to be shuffled once all players confirm. Resilient Population may be played now (if available). [Confirm]"• Questo testo è disponibile nel sistema di traduzione? Se sì, è stato tradotto nell'arco di più di 24 ore?
• Qual è il tuo browser?
Google Chrome v91
• Spiega il tuo suggerimento in modo preciso e conciso in modo che sia il più semplice possibile per capire cosa intendi.
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
This suggestion is that in a turn-based game the players are called back to the table after step two, but before step three of an Epidemic card being resolved; rather than after step three has been resolved which seems to be the case right now. (i.e. Bring them back at the same timing window as Resilient Population is playable)
This would also mean the players would need to press a confirm button (this functionality could be altered with a player option) so that the game does not automatically advance once the final person views the table.
The new message might look something like the following "A new Epidemic has occurred. The Infection discard pile is about to be shuffled once all players confirm. Resilient Population may be played now (if available). [Confirm]"• Qual è il tuo browser?
Google Chrome v91
Storico dei resoconti
Both are in service of allowing more information to turn-based players about what was in the discard pile that just got shuffled as this information is easily missed.
In a game played IRL we will always use the privilege provided to us by the rules ("Players may freely examine either discard pile at any time") to ensure we know, and then track what is being shuffled and placed on the Infection draw pile
Aggiungi qualcosa a questo report
- Un altro ID tavolo / ID mossa
- F5 ha risolto il problema?
- Il problema si verifica spesso? Ogni volta? Casualmente?
- Se hai una schermata di questo errore (cosa buona e giusta), puoi usare Imgur.com per caricarla e fare copia/incolla del link qui.