• Per favore copia/incolla il messaggio di errore visualizzato sullo schermo, se possibile.

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• Per favore spiega cosa avresti voluto fare, cosa hai fatto e cosa è successo

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Per favore copia/incolla il testo visualizzato in inglese invece che nella tua lingua. Se hai uno screenshot di questo bug (è sempre buona norma farlo), usa un servizio di caricamento immagini a tua scelta (come snipboard.io) per caricarlo e copiare/incollare il link qui. Questo testo è disponibile nel sistema di traduzione? Se sì, è stato tradotto nell'arco di più di 24 ore?

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Spiega il tuo suggerimento in modo preciso e conciso in modo che sia il più semplice possibile per capire cosa intendi.

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Cosa era mostrato sullo schermo quando sei rimasto bloccato (schermo bianco? interfaccia di gioco parziale? messaggio di errore?)

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Quale parte delle regole non è stata rispettata dall'adattamento BGA

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• La violazione delle regole è visibile nel replay della partita? Se sì, a che numero di mossa?

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Qual era l'azione di gioco che volevi fare?

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• Cosa stai provando a fare per attivare questa azione di gioco?

• Cosa è successo quando hai provato a fare questo (messaggio di errore, messaggio nella barra di stato del gioco...)?

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• In quale fase del gioco si è verificato il problema (qual era l'istruzione della partita in corso)?

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• Cosa è successo quando hai provato a fare questa azione di gioco (messaggio di errore, messaggio nella barra di stato del gioco...)?

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Per favore descrivi il problema rilevato. Se hai uno screenshot di questo bug (è sempre buona norma farlo), usa un servizio di caricamento immagini a tua scelta (come snipboard.io) per caricarlo e copiare/incollare il link qui.

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Per favore copia/incolla il testo visualizzato in inglese invece che nella tua lingua. Se hai uno screenshot di questo bug (è sempre buona norma farlo), usa un servizio di caricamento immagini a tua scelta (come snipboard.io) per caricarlo e copiare/incollare il link qui. Questo testo è disponibile nel sistema di traduzione? Se sì, è stato tradotto nell'arco di più di 24 ore?

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Spiega il tuo suggerimento in modo preciso e conciso in modo che sia il più semplice possibile per capire cosa intendi.

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• Qual è il tuo browser?