#79532: "Enforce simultaneity"
A che riguardo è la segnalazione?
Cos'è successo? Prego, seleziona tra le seguenti
Cos'è successo? Prego, seleziona tra le seguenti
Si prega di verificare se esiste già una segnalazione sullo stesso argomento
Se sì, per favore VOTA solo questa segnalazione. Segnalazioni con più voti hanno priorità di presa in carico!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Descrizione dettagliata
-
• Per favore copia/incolla il messaggio di errore visualizzato sullo schermo, se possibile.
This is between a suggestion and a bug.
As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.
I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.
( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )
This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.
-
• Per favore spiega cosa avresti voluto fare, cosa hai fatto e cosa è successo
• Qual è il tuo browser?
Google Chrome v102
-
• Per favore copia/incolla il testo visualizzato in inglese invece che nella tua lingua. Se hai una schermata di questo errore (cosa buona e giusta), puoi usare Imgur.com per caricarla e fare copia/incolla del link qui.
This is between a suggestion and a bug.
As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.
I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.
( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )
This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.
-
• Questo testo è disponibile nel sistema di traduzione? Se sì, è stato tradotto nell'arco di più di 24 ore?
• Qual è il tuo browser?
Google Chrome v102
-
• Spiega il tuo suggerimento in modo preciso e conciso in modo che sia il più semplice possibile per capire cosa intendi.
This is between a suggestion and a bug.
As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.
I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.
( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )
This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.
• Qual è il tuo browser?
Google Chrome v102
-
• Cosa era mostrato sullo schermo quando sei rimasto bloccato (schermo bianco? interfaccia di gioco parziale? messaggio di errore?)
This is between a suggestion and a bug.
As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.
I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.
( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )
This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.
• Qual è il tuo browser?
Google Chrome v102
-
• Quale parte delle regole non è stata rispettata dall'adattamento BGA
This is between a suggestion and a bug.
As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.
I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.
( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )
This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.
-
• La violazione delle regole è visibile nel replay della partita? Se sì, a che numero di mossa?
• Qual è il tuo browser?
Google Chrome v102
-
• Qual era l'azione di gioco che volevi fare?
This is between a suggestion and a bug.
As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.
I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.
( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )
This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.
-
• Cosa stai provando a fare per attivare questa azione di gioco?
-
• Cosa è successo quando hai provato a fare questo (messaggio di errore, messaggio nella barra di stato del gioco...)?
• Qual è il tuo browser?
Google Chrome v102
-
• In quale fase del gioco si è verificato il problema (qual era l'istruzione della partita in corso)?
This is between a suggestion and a bug.
As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.
I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.
( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )
This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.
-
• Cosa è successo quando hai provato a fare questa azione di gioco (messaggio di errore, messaggio nella barra di stato del gioco...)?
• Qual è il tuo browser?
Google Chrome v102
-
• Per favore descrivi il problema rilevato. Se hai una schermata di questo errore (cosa buona e giusta), puoi usare Imgur.com per caricarla e fare copia/incolla del link qui.
This is between a suggestion and a bug.
As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.
I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.
( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )
This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.
• Qual è il tuo browser?
Google Chrome v102
-
• Per favore copia/incolla il testo visualizzato in inglese invece che nella tua lingua. Se hai una schermata di questo errore (cosa buona e giusta), puoi usare Imgur.com per caricarla e fare copia/incolla del link qui.
This is between a suggestion and a bug.
As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.
I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.
( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )
This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.
-
• Questo testo è disponibile nel sistema di traduzione? Se sì, è stato tradotto nell'arco di più di 24 ore?
• Qual è il tuo browser?
Google Chrome v102
-
• Spiega il tuo suggerimento in modo preciso e conciso in modo che sia il più semplice possibile per capire cosa intendi.
This is between a suggestion and a bug.
As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.
I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.
( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )
This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.
• Qual è il tuo browser?
Google Chrome v102
Storico dei resoconti
Aggiungi qualcosa a questo report
- Un altro ID tavolo / ID mossa
- F5 ha risolto il problema?
- Il problema si verifica spesso? Ogni volta? Casualmente?
- Se hai una schermata di questo errore (cosa buona e giusta), puoi usare Imgur.com per caricarla e fare copia/incolla del link qui.
