#61868: "End scoring result seems incorrect"
A che riguardo è la segnalazione?
Cos'è successo? Prego, seleziona tra le seguenti
Cos'è successo? Prego, seleziona tra le seguenti
Si prega di verificare se esiste già una segnalazione sullo stesso argomento
Se sì, per favore VOTA solo questa segnalazione. Segnalazioni con più voti hanno priorità di presa in carico!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Descrizione dettagliata
-
• Per favore copia/incolla il messaggio di errore visualizzato sullo schermo, se possibile.
Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1
As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".
So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?
But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
? -
• Per favore spiega cosa avresti voluto fare, cosa hai fatto e cosa è successo
• Qual è il tuo browser?
Google Chrome v99
-
• Per favore copia/incolla il testo visualizzato in inglese invece che nella tua lingua. Se hai una schermata di questo errore (cosa buona e giusta), puoi usare Imgur.com per caricarla e fare copia/incolla del link qui.
Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1
As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".
So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?
But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
? -
• Questo testo è disponibile nel sistema di traduzione? Se sì, è stato tradotto nell'arco di più di 24 ore?
• Qual è il tuo browser?
Google Chrome v99
-
• Spiega il tuo suggerimento in modo preciso e conciso in modo che sia il più semplice possibile per capire cosa intendi.
Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1
As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".
So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?
But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
? • Qual è il tuo browser?
Google Chrome v99
-
• Cosa era mostrato sullo schermo quando sei rimasto bloccato (schermo bianco? interfaccia di gioco parziale? messaggio di errore?)
Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1
As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".
So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?
But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
? • Qual è il tuo browser?
Google Chrome v99
-
• Quale parte delle regole non è stata rispettata dall'adattamento BGA
Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1
As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".
So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?
But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
? -
• La violazione delle regole è visibile nel replay della partita? Se sì, a che numero di mossa?
• Qual è il tuo browser?
Google Chrome v99
-
• Qual era l'azione di gioco che volevi fare?
Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1
As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".
So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?
But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
? -
• Cosa stai provando a fare per attivare questa azione di gioco?
-
• Cosa è successo quando hai provato a fare questo (messaggio di errore, messaggio nella barra di stato del gioco...)?
• Qual è il tuo browser?
Google Chrome v99
-
• In quale fase del gioco si è verificato il problema (qual era l'istruzione della partita in corso)?
Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1
As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".
So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?
But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
? -
• Cosa è successo quando hai provato a fare questa azione di gioco (messaggio di errore, messaggio nella barra di stato del gioco...)?
• Qual è il tuo browser?
Google Chrome v99
-
• Per favore descrivi il problema rilevato. Se hai una schermata di questo errore (cosa buona e giusta), puoi usare Imgur.com per caricarla e fare copia/incolla del link qui.
Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1
As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".
So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?
But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
? • Qual è il tuo browser?
Google Chrome v99
-
• Per favore copia/incolla il testo visualizzato in inglese invece che nella tua lingua. Se hai una schermata di questo errore (cosa buona e giusta), puoi usare Imgur.com per caricarla e fare copia/incolla del link qui.
Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1
As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".
So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?
But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
? -
• Questo testo è disponibile nel sistema di traduzione? Se sì, è stato tradotto nell'arco di più di 24 ore?
• Qual è il tuo browser?
Google Chrome v99
-
• Spiega il tuo suggerimento in modo preciso e conciso in modo che sia il più semplice possibile per capire cosa intendi.
Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1
As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".
So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?
But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
? • Qual è il tuo browser?
Google Chrome v99
Storico dei resoconti
Even though I ended with total score = 0, my Status still shows "get promoted to dead-end job", probably because I worked an extra shift (or the last shift?) in the last round.
The highest player only survives when the player is sole survivor or all surviving players perfectly tied.
My interpretation of the rules was that only players that worked too hard could get “promoted”.
This rule is quite relevant in multiplayer single round games, since players cannot bid 0 in single round games.
Aggiungi qualcosa a questo report
- Un altro ID tavolo / ID mossa
- F5 ha risolto il problema?
- Il problema si verifica spesso? Ogni volta? Casualmente?
- Se hai una schermata di questo errore (cosa buona e giusta), puoi usare Imgur.com per caricarla e fare copia/incolla del link qui.
