• Per favore copia/incolla il messaggio di errore visualizzato sullo schermo, se possibile.

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• Per favore spiega cosa avresti voluto fare, cosa hai fatto e cosa è successo

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Per favore copia/incolla il testo visualizzato in inglese invece che nella tua lingua. Se hai una schermata di questo errore (cosa buona e giusta), puoi usare Imgur.com per caricarla e fare copia/incolla del link qui.

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• Questo testo è disponibile nel sistema di traduzione? Se sì, è stato tradotto nell'arco di più di 24 ore?

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Spiega il tuo suggerimento in modo preciso e conciso in modo che sia il più semplice possibile per capire cosa intendi.

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Cosa era mostrato sullo schermo quando sei rimasto bloccato (schermo bianco? interfaccia di gioco parziale? messaggio di errore?)

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Quale parte delle regole non è stata rispettata dall'adattamento BGA

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• La violazione delle regole è visibile nel replay della partita? Se sì, a che numero di mossa?

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Qual era l'azione di gioco che volevi fare?

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• Cosa stai provando a fare per attivare questa azione di gioco?

• Cosa è successo quando hai provato a fare questo (messaggio di errore, messaggio nella barra di stato del gioco...)?

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• In quale fase del gioco si è verificato il problema (qual era l'istruzione della partita in corso)?

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• Cosa è successo quando hai provato a fare questa azione di gioco (messaggio di errore, messaggio nella barra di stato del gioco...)?

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Per favore descrivi il problema rilevato. Se hai una schermata di questo errore (cosa buona e giusta), puoi usare Imgur.com per caricarla e fare copia/incolla del link qui.

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Per favore copia/incolla il testo visualizzato in inglese invece che nella tua lingua. Se hai una schermata di questo errore (cosa buona e giusta), puoi usare Imgur.com per caricarla e fare copia/incolla del link qui.

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• Questo testo è disponibile nel sistema di traduzione? Se sì, è stato tradotto nell'arco di più di 24 ore?

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Spiega il tuo suggerimento in modo preciso e conciso in modo che sia il più semplice possibile per capire cosa intendi.

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• Qual è il tuo browser?