• Per favore copia/incolla il messaggio di errore visualizzato sullo schermo, se possibile.

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• Per favore spiega cosa avresti voluto fare, cosa hai fatto e cosa è successo

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Per favore copia/incolla il testo visualizzato in inglese invece che nella tua lingua. Se hai una schermata di questo errore (cosa buona e giusta), puoi usare Imgur.com per caricarla e fare copia/incolla del link qui.

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• Questo testo è disponibile nel sistema di traduzione? Se sì, è stato tradotto nell'arco di più di 24 ore?

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Spiega il tuo suggerimento in modo preciso e conciso in modo che sia il più semplice possibile per capire cosa intendi.

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Cosa era mostrato sullo schermo quando sei rimasto bloccato (schermo bianco? interfaccia di gioco parziale? messaggio di errore?)

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Quale parte delle regole non è stata rispettata dall'adattamento BGA

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• La violazione delle regole è visibile nel replay della partita? Se sì, a che numero di mossa?

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Qual era l'azione di gioco che volevi fare?

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• Cosa stai provando a fare per attivare questa azione di gioco?

• Cosa è successo quando hai provato a fare questo (messaggio di errore, messaggio nella barra di stato del gioco...)?

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• In quale fase del gioco si è verificato il problema (qual era l'istruzione della partita in corso)?

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• Cosa è successo quando hai provato a fare questa azione di gioco (messaggio di errore, messaggio nella barra di stato del gioco...)?

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Per favore descrivi il problema rilevato. Se hai una schermata di questo errore (cosa buona e giusta), puoi usare Imgur.com per caricarla e fare copia/incolla del link qui.

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Per favore copia/incolla il testo visualizzato in inglese invece che nella tua lingua. Se hai una schermata di questo errore (cosa buona e giusta), puoi usare Imgur.com per caricarla e fare copia/incolla del link qui.

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• Questo testo è disponibile nel sistema di traduzione? Se sì, è stato tradotto nell'arco di più di 24 ore?

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Spiega il tuo suggerimento in modo preciso e conciso in modo che sia il più semplice possibile per capire cosa intendi.

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• Qual è il tuo browser?