• Per favore copia/incolla il messaggio di errore visualizzato sullo schermo, se possibile.

So it never says anywhere that one does not know what is in your deal stack. it should be lookable all the time

• Per favore spiega cosa avresti voluto fare, cosa hai fatto e cosa è successo

this is also a follow up regarding bug 177457

So overall the main reason it does matter is regarding negotiator and interactions thereof.
In the particular game spies is used to steal a card deal when there are two. There is no selection available which one to choose for the roman player (similar i guess with ninjas, barbarian remove deal card) which should be possible (so game error one: stealing player needs an option to choose)
Secondly, the game log only says that a card deal is taken but not which. The japenese player in this case needs to get the information which card was taken, without having already played negotiator which is currently the only time you get to see them. Which even if you remember what all your deals are you would be able in the game to remember which card is which (due to the order of play, you stack those cards one after another on top of the faction sheet acording to the rules), but with the current implementation you cannot as deals are just ordered by type and not time of play. Even if it were time of play if two similar deals are done after eachother you wouldn't know which card was taken away (i.e. two card draws in this case)

- so first the game log should not only say makes deal with $factioncardname but also
- spies steal $factioncardname
- you should always show in a hover over or similar which cards are made deals with (like negotiator)
- (if fully opposed against that for implementation we would need to track the temporal play order and not just order by ress, so a player can choose a specific deal card (whichs info was public when played (see -1)), and then it needs to be logged so the player deals are taken from knows which one in case of similar ress after each other in temporal deal play)

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Per favore copia/incolla il testo visualizzato in inglese invece che nella tua lingua. Se hai una schermata di questo errore (cosa buona e giusta), puoi usare Imgur.com per caricarla e fare copia/incolla del link qui.

So it never says anywhere that one does not know what is in your deal stack. it should be lookable all the time

• Questo testo è disponibile nel sistema di traduzione? Se sì, è stato tradotto nell'arco di più di 24 ore?

this is also a follow up regarding bug 177457

So overall the main reason it does matter is regarding negotiator and interactions thereof.
In the particular game spies is used to steal a card deal when there are two. There is no selection available which one to choose for the roman player (similar i guess with ninjas, barbarian remove deal card) which should be possible (so game error one: stealing player needs an option to choose)
Secondly, the game log only says that a card deal is taken but not which. The japenese player in this case needs to get the information which card was taken, without having already played negotiator which is currently the only time you get to see them. Which even if you remember what all your deals are you would be able in the game to remember which card is which (due to the order of play, you stack those cards one after another on top of the faction sheet acording to the rules), but with the current implementation you cannot as deals are just ordered by type and not time of play. Even if it were time of play if two similar deals are done after eachother you wouldn't know which card was taken away (i.e. two card draws in this case)

- so first the game log should not only say makes deal with $factioncardname but also
- spies steal $factioncardname
- you should always show in a hover over or similar which cards are made deals with (like negotiator)
- (if fully opposed against that for implementation we would need to track the temporal play order and not just order by ress, so a player can choose a specific deal card (whichs info was public when played (see -1)), and then it needs to be logged so the player deals are taken from knows which one in case of similar ress after each other in temporal deal play)

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Spiega il tuo suggerimento in modo preciso e conciso in modo che sia il più semplice possibile per capire cosa intendi.

So it never says anywhere that one does not know what is in your deal stack. it should be lookable all the time

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Cosa era mostrato sullo schermo quando sei rimasto bloccato (schermo bianco? interfaccia di gioco parziale? messaggio di errore?)

So it never says anywhere that one does not know what is in your deal stack. it should be lookable all the time

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Quale parte delle regole non è stata rispettata dall'adattamento BGA

So it never says anywhere that one does not know what is in your deal stack. it should be lookable all the time

• La violazione delle regole è visibile nel replay della partita? Se sì, a che numero di mossa?

this is also a follow up regarding bug 177457

So overall the main reason it does matter is regarding negotiator and interactions thereof.
In the particular game spies is used to steal a card deal when there are two. There is no selection available which one to choose for the roman player (similar i guess with ninjas, barbarian remove deal card) which should be possible (so game error one: stealing player needs an option to choose)
Secondly, the game log only says that a card deal is taken but not which. The japenese player in this case needs to get the information which card was taken, without having already played negotiator which is currently the only time you get to see them. Which even if you remember what all your deals are you would be able in the game to remember which card is which (due to the order of play, you stack those cards one after another on top of the faction sheet acording to the rules), but with the current implementation you cannot as deals are just ordered by type and not time of play. Even if it were time of play if two similar deals are done after eachother you wouldn't know which card was taken away (i.e. two card draws in this case)

- so first the game log should not only say makes deal with $factioncardname but also
- spies steal $factioncardname
- you should always show in a hover over or similar which cards are made deals with (like negotiator)
- (if fully opposed against that for implementation we would need to track the temporal play order and not just order by ress, so a player can choose a specific deal card (whichs info was public when played (see -1)), and then it needs to be logged so the player deals are taken from knows which one in case of similar ress after each other in temporal deal play)

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Qual era l'azione di gioco che volevi fare?

So it never says anywhere that one does not know what is in your deal stack. it should be lookable all the time

• Cosa stai provando a fare per attivare questa azione di gioco?

this is also a follow up regarding bug 177457

So overall the main reason it does matter is regarding negotiator and interactions thereof.
In the particular game spies is used to steal a card deal when there are two. There is no selection available which one to choose for the roman player (similar i guess with ninjas, barbarian remove deal card) which should be possible (so game error one: stealing player needs an option to choose)
Secondly, the game log only says that a card deal is taken but not which. The japenese player in this case needs to get the information which card was taken, without having already played negotiator which is currently the only time you get to see them. Which even if you remember what all your deals are you would be able in the game to remember which card is which (due to the order of play, you stack those cards one after another on top of the faction sheet acording to the rules), but with the current implementation you cannot as deals are just ordered by type and not time of play. Even if it were time of play if two similar deals are done after eachother you wouldn't know which card was taken away (i.e. two card draws in this case)

- so first the game log should not only say makes deal with $factioncardname but also
- spies steal $factioncardname
- you should always show in a hover over or similar which cards are made deals with (like negotiator)
- (if fully opposed against that for implementation we would need to track the temporal play order and not just order by ress, so a player can choose a specific deal card (whichs info was public when played (see -1)), and then it needs to be logged so the player deals are taken from knows which one in case of similar ress after each other in temporal deal play)

• Cosa è successo quando hai provato a fare questo (messaggio di errore, messaggio nella barra di stato del gioco...)?

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• In quale fase del gioco si è verificato il problema (qual era l'istruzione della partita in corso)?

So it never says anywhere that one does not know what is in your deal stack. it should be lookable all the time

• Cosa è successo quando hai provato a fare questa azione di gioco (messaggio di errore, messaggio nella barra di stato del gioco...)?

this is also a follow up regarding bug 177457

So overall the main reason it does matter is regarding negotiator and interactions thereof.
In the particular game spies is used to steal a card deal when there are two. There is no selection available which one to choose for the roman player (similar i guess with ninjas, barbarian remove deal card) which should be possible (so game error one: stealing player needs an option to choose)
Secondly, the game log only says that a card deal is taken but not which. The japenese player in this case needs to get the information which card was taken, without having already played negotiator which is currently the only time you get to see them. Which even if you remember what all your deals are you would be able in the game to remember which card is which (due to the order of play, you stack those cards one after another on top of the faction sheet acording to the rules), but with the current implementation you cannot as deals are just ordered by type and not time of play. Even if it were time of play if two similar deals are done after eachother you wouldn't know which card was taken away (i.e. two card draws in this case)

- so first the game log should not only say makes deal with $factioncardname but also
- spies steal $factioncardname
- you should always show in a hover over or similar which cards are made deals with (like negotiator)
- (if fully opposed against that for implementation we would need to track the temporal play order and not just order by ress, so a player can choose a specific deal card (whichs info was public when played (see -1)), and then it needs to be logged so the player deals are taken from knows which one in case of similar ress after each other in temporal deal play)

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Per favore descrivi il problema rilevato. Se hai una schermata di questo errore (cosa buona e giusta), puoi usare Imgur.com per caricarla e fare copia/incolla del link qui.

So it never says anywhere that one does not know what is in your deal stack. it should be lookable all the time

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Per favore copia/incolla il testo visualizzato in inglese invece che nella tua lingua. Se hai una schermata di questo errore (cosa buona e giusta), puoi usare Imgur.com per caricarla e fare copia/incolla del link qui.

So it never says anywhere that one does not know what is in your deal stack. it should be lookable all the time

• Questo testo è disponibile nel sistema di traduzione? Se sì, è stato tradotto nell'arco di più di 24 ore?

this is also a follow up regarding bug 177457

So overall the main reason it does matter is regarding negotiator and interactions thereof.
In the particular game spies is used to steal a card deal when there are two. There is no selection available which one to choose for the roman player (similar i guess with ninjas, barbarian remove deal card) which should be possible (so game error one: stealing player needs an option to choose)
Secondly, the game log only says that a card deal is taken but not which. The japenese player in this case needs to get the information which card was taken, without having already played negotiator which is currently the only time you get to see them. Which even if you remember what all your deals are you would be able in the game to remember which card is which (due to the order of play, you stack those cards one after another on top of the faction sheet acording to the rules), but with the current implementation you cannot as deals are just ordered by type and not time of play. Even if it were time of play if two similar deals are done after eachother you wouldn't know which card was taken away (i.e. two card draws in this case)

- so first the game log should not only say makes deal with $factioncardname but also
- spies steal $factioncardname
- you should always show in a hover over or similar which cards are made deals with (like negotiator)
- (if fully opposed against that for implementation we would need to track the temporal play order and not just order by ress, so a player can choose a specific deal card (whichs info was public when played (see -1)), and then it needs to be logged so the player deals are taken from knows which one in case of similar ress after each other in temporal deal play)

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Spiega il tuo suggerimento in modo preciso e conciso in modo che sia il più semplice possibile per capire cosa intendi.

So it never says anywhere that one does not know what is in your deal stack. it should be lookable all the time

• Qual è il tuo browser?