• Per favore copia/incolla il messaggio di errore visualizzato sullo schermo, se possibile.

I participated in a Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=366115) and finished with two victories and two defeats, exactly as user darthdalek did. I wondered why she was declared third winner of the tournament and I was given only 4th place when we had the same results. When I asked support about this, Emma from the support team told me "ties are broken randomly by the algorythm". I think this is ridiculous, as it could easily be changed. In such cases, you could give both players a reward for the third place, for example. If you prefer only one player in each rank, there are several tie breakers possible. In this tournament everyone played against everyone, so you could look at the direct comparison between two tied players. I won against darthdalek, so I proved I was a better player than her! Alternatively, you could choose the player who needed less moves or less time, if you want to. Everything would be better than letting the algorythm decide randomly.
In another Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=375146) the same problem occured again: user Cyclope and I had 13 victories and one defeat each. He was declared winner of the tournament and I only second. And once again, I had defeated him, so I proved better! This is really frustrating.
I see this can't be changed for past tournaments, but it has to be changed for future ones.

• Per favore spiega cosa avresti voluto fare, cosa hai fatto e cosa è successo

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Per favore copia/incolla il testo visualizzato in inglese invece che nella tua lingua. Se hai uno screenshot di questo bug (è sempre buona norma farlo), usa un servizio di caricamento immagini a tua scelta (come snipboard.io) per caricarlo e copiare/incollare il link qui. Questo testo è disponibile nel sistema di traduzione? Se sì, è stato tradotto nell'arco di più di 24 ore?

I participated in a Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=366115) and finished with two victories and two defeats, exactly as user darthdalek did. I wondered why she was declared third winner of the tournament and I was given only 4th place when we had the same results. When I asked support about this, Emma from the support team told me "ties are broken randomly by the algorythm". I think this is ridiculous, as it could easily be changed. In such cases, you could give both players a reward for the third place, for example. If you prefer only one player in each rank, there are several tie breakers possible. In this tournament everyone played against everyone, so you could look at the direct comparison between two tied players. I won against darthdalek, so I proved I was a better player than her! Alternatively, you could choose the player who needed less moves or less time, if you want to. Everything would be better than letting the algorythm decide randomly.
In another Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=375146) the same problem occured again: user Cyclope and I had 13 victories and one defeat each. He was declared winner of the tournament and I only second. And once again, I had defeated him, so I proved better! This is really frustrating.
I see this can't be changed for past tournaments, but it has to be changed for future ones.

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Spiega il tuo suggerimento in modo preciso e conciso in modo che sia il più semplice possibile per capire cosa intendi.

I participated in a Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=366115) and finished with two victories and two defeats, exactly as user darthdalek did. I wondered why she was declared third winner of the tournament and I was given only 4th place when we had the same results. When I asked support about this, Emma from the support team told me "ties are broken randomly by the algorythm". I think this is ridiculous, as it could easily be changed. In such cases, you could give both players a reward for the third place, for example. If you prefer only one player in each rank, there are several tie breakers possible. In this tournament everyone played against everyone, so you could look at the direct comparison between two tied players. I won against darthdalek, so I proved I was a better player than her! Alternatively, you could choose the player who needed less moves or less time, if you want to. Everything would be better than letting the algorythm decide randomly.
In another Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=375146) the same problem occured again: user Cyclope and I had 13 victories and one defeat each. He was declared winner of the tournament and I only second. And once again, I had defeated him, so I proved better! This is really frustrating.
I see this can't be changed for past tournaments, but it has to be changed for future ones.

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Cosa era mostrato sullo schermo quando sei rimasto bloccato (schermo bianco? interfaccia di gioco parziale? messaggio di errore?)

I participated in a Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=366115) and finished with two victories and two defeats, exactly as user darthdalek did. I wondered why she was declared third winner of the tournament and I was given only 4th place when we had the same results. When I asked support about this, Emma from the support team told me "ties are broken randomly by the algorythm". I think this is ridiculous, as it could easily be changed. In such cases, you could give both players a reward for the third place, for example. If you prefer only one player in each rank, there are several tie breakers possible. In this tournament everyone played against everyone, so you could look at the direct comparison between two tied players. I won against darthdalek, so I proved I was a better player than her! Alternatively, you could choose the player who needed less moves or less time, if you want to. Everything would be better than letting the algorythm decide randomly.
In another Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=375146) the same problem occured again: user Cyclope and I had 13 victories and one defeat each. He was declared winner of the tournament and I only second. And once again, I had defeated him, so I proved better! This is really frustrating.
I see this can't be changed for past tournaments, but it has to be changed for future ones.

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Quale parte delle regole non è stata rispettata dall'adattamento BGA

I participated in a Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=366115) and finished with two victories and two defeats, exactly as user darthdalek did. I wondered why she was declared third winner of the tournament and I was given only 4th place when we had the same results. When I asked support about this, Emma from the support team told me "ties are broken randomly by the algorythm". I think this is ridiculous, as it could easily be changed. In such cases, you could give both players a reward for the third place, for example. If you prefer only one player in each rank, there are several tie breakers possible. In this tournament everyone played against everyone, so you could look at the direct comparison between two tied players. I won against darthdalek, so I proved I was a better player than her! Alternatively, you could choose the player who needed less moves or less time, if you want to. Everything would be better than letting the algorythm decide randomly.
In another Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=375146) the same problem occured again: user Cyclope and I had 13 victories and one defeat each. He was declared winner of the tournament and I only second. And once again, I had defeated him, so I proved better! This is really frustrating.
I see this can't be changed for past tournaments, but it has to be changed for future ones.

• La violazione delle regole è visibile nel replay della partita? Se sì, a che numero di mossa?

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Qual era l'azione di gioco che volevi fare?

I participated in a Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=366115) and finished with two victories and two defeats, exactly as user darthdalek did. I wondered why she was declared third winner of the tournament and I was given only 4th place when we had the same results. When I asked support about this, Emma from the support team told me "ties are broken randomly by the algorythm". I think this is ridiculous, as it could easily be changed. In such cases, you could give both players a reward for the third place, for example. If you prefer only one player in each rank, there are several tie breakers possible. In this tournament everyone played against everyone, so you could look at the direct comparison between two tied players. I won against darthdalek, so I proved I was a better player than her! Alternatively, you could choose the player who needed less moves or less time, if you want to. Everything would be better than letting the algorythm decide randomly.
In another Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=375146) the same problem occured again: user Cyclope and I had 13 victories and one defeat each. He was declared winner of the tournament and I only second. And once again, I had defeated him, so I proved better! This is really frustrating.
I see this can't be changed for past tournaments, but it has to be changed for future ones.

• Cosa stai provando a fare per attivare questa azione di gioco?

• Cosa è successo quando hai provato a fare questo (messaggio di errore, messaggio nella barra di stato del gioco...)?

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• In quale fase del gioco si è verificato il problema (qual era l'istruzione della partita in corso)?

I participated in a Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=366115) and finished with two victories and two defeats, exactly as user darthdalek did. I wondered why she was declared third winner of the tournament and I was given only 4th place when we had the same results. When I asked support about this, Emma from the support team told me "ties are broken randomly by the algorythm". I think this is ridiculous, as it could easily be changed. In such cases, you could give both players a reward for the third place, for example. If you prefer only one player in each rank, there are several tie breakers possible. In this tournament everyone played against everyone, so you could look at the direct comparison between two tied players. I won against darthdalek, so I proved I was a better player than her! Alternatively, you could choose the player who needed less moves or less time, if you want to. Everything would be better than letting the algorythm decide randomly.
In another Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=375146) the same problem occured again: user Cyclope and I had 13 victories and one defeat each. He was declared winner of the tournament and I only second. And once again, I had defeated him, so I proved better! This is really frustrating.
I see this can't be changed for past tournaments, but it has to be changed for future ones.

• Cosa è successo quando hai provato a fare questa azione di gioco (messaggio di errore, messaggio nella barra di stato del gioco...)?

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Per favore descrivi il problema rilevato. Se hai uno screenshot di questo bug (è sempre buona norma farlo), usa un servizio di caricamento immagini a tua scelta (come snipboard.io) per caricarlo e copiare/incollare il link qui.

I participated in a Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=366115) and finished with two victories and two defeats, exactly as user darthdalek did. I wondered why she was declared third winner of the tournament and I was given only 4th place when we had the same results. When I asked support about this, Emma from the support team told me "ties are broken randomly by the algorythm". I think this is ridiculous, as it could easily be changed. In such cases, you could give both players a reward for the third place, for example. If you prefer only one player in each rank, there are several tie breakers possible. In this tournament everyone played against everyone, so you could look at the direct comparison between two tied players. I won against darthdalek, so I proved I was a better player than her! Alternatively, you could choose the player who needed less moves or less time, if you want to. Everything would be better than letting the algorythm decide randomly.
In another Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=375146) the same problem occured again: user Cyclope and I had 13 victories and one defeat each. He was declared winner of the tournament and I only second. And once again, I had defeated him, so I proved better! This is really frustrating.
I see this can't be changed for past tournaments, but it has to be changed for future ones.

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Per favore copia/incolla il testo visualizzato in inglese invece che nella tua lingua. Se hai uno screenshot di questo bug (è sempre buona norma farlo), usa un servizio di caricamento immagini a tua scelta (come snipboard.io) per caricarlo e copiare/incollare il link qui. Questo testo è disponibile nel sistema di traduzione? Se sì, è stato tradotto nell'arco di più di 24 ore?

I participated in a Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=366115) and finished with two victories and two defeats, exactly as user darthdalek did. I wondered why she was declared third winner of the tournament and I was given only 4th place when we had the same results. When I asked support about this, Emma from the support team told me "ties are broken randomly by the algorythm". I think this is ridiculous, as it could easily be changed. In such cases, you could give both players a reward for the third place, for example. If you prefer only one player in each rank, there are several tie breakers possible. In this tournament everyone played against everyone, so you could look at the direct comparison between two tied players. I won against darthdalek, so I proved I was a better player than her! Alternatively, you could choose the player who needed less moves or less time, if you want to. Everything would be better than letting the algorythm decide randomly.
In another Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=375146) the same problem occured again: user Cyclope and I had 13 victories and one defeat each. He was declared winner of the tournament and I only second. And once again, I had defeated him, so I proved better! This is really frustrating.
I see this can't be changed for past tournaments, but it has to be changed for future ones.

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Spiega il tuo suggerimento in modo preciso e conciso in modo che sia il più semplice possibile per capire cosa intendi.

I participated in a Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=366115) and finished with two victories and two defeats, exactly as user darthdalek did. I wondered why she was declared third winner of the tournament and I was given only 4th place when we had the same results. When I asked support about this, Emma from the support team told me "ties are broken randomly by the algorythm". I think this is ridiculous, as it could easily be changed. In such cases, you could give both players a reward for the third place, for example. If you prefer only one player in each rank, there are several tie breakers possible. In this tournament everyone played against everyone, so you could look at the direct comparison between two tied players. I won against darthdalek, so I proved I was a better player than her! Alternatively, you could choose the player who needed less moves or less time, if you want to. Everything would be better than letting the algorythm decide randomly.
In another Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=375146) the same problem occured again: user Cyclope and I had 13 victories and one defeat each. He was declared winner of the tournament and I only second. And once again, I had defeated him, so I proved better! This is really frustrating.
I see this can't be changed for past tournaments, but it has to be changed for future ones.

• Qual è il tuo browser?