Tutti i resoconti
Mini Rogue resoconto
#127481: "above average number of X rolls"
rejected: Gli sviluppatori pensano non sia una buona idea o che il rapporto costo/benefici sia troppo alto
1
A che riguardo è la segnalazione?
Cos'è successo? Prego, seleziona tra le seguenti
Suggerimento: a mio parere, quanto di seguito migliorerebbe notevolmente l'implementazione del gioco
Descrizione dettagliata
• Spiega il tuo suggerimento in modo preciso e conciso in modo che sia il più semplice possibile per capire cosa intendi.
This game seems to pull a higher than average number of x's. In this game there is an example where I rolled 2 x's, and I rerolled them twice and rerolled 2 x's again.• Qual è il tuo browser?
Google Chrome v125
Storico dei resoconti
15 giu 2024 23:32 • Thee Cormorant • Questo suggerimento non è stato ancora analizzato dagli sviluppatori:
this problem appears several games through
16 giu 2024 1:25 • Kayvon • Gli sviluppatori pensano non sia una buona idea o che il rapporto costo/benefici sia troppo alto:
Here's an analysis of half a million random numbers generated by BGA:
boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=15811&p=59122&hilit=bga_rand#p59122
The dice are weighted exactly as expected. Sorry about your bad luck.
boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=15811&p=59122&hilit=bga_rand#p59122
The dice are weighted exactly as expected. Sorry about your bad luck.
22 giu 2024 4:51 • mightypica • Gli sviluppatori pensano non sia una buona idea o che il rapporto costo/benefici sia troppo alto:
Disagree, I roll more X than others in 2p game. I rolled 2 X, at one point and then 3 X and a 1 ( black dice) all in a row. I own the game and playing it live vs this, the average is way off with this game. Not sure if it’s 2 player issue or. It but needs to be resolved.
22 giu 2024 5:45 • Kayvon • Gli sviluppatori pensano non sia una buona idea o che il rapporto costo/benefici sia troppo alto:
There's nothing to resolve, but you're welcome to disagree all the same.
I'd invite you to share your thoughts in the forums where it's a common topic. You'll find several people who agree with you.
I'd invite you to share your thoughts in the forums where it's a common topic. You'll find several people who agree with you.
23 lug 2024 18:26 • Kevisch • Gli sviluppatori pensano non sia una buona idea o che il rapporto costo/benefici sia troppo alto:
i m sorry, but a ratio like that isn t possible.
23 lug 2024 18:29 • Kayvon • Gli sviluppatori pensano non sia una buona idea o che il rapporto costo/benefici sia troppo alto:
Not only is it possible, but it's actually likely to happen once in a thousand games or so. Given the thousands played on BGA of just this game, we expect to see exceptional coincidences from time to time. That's the very nature of statistics.
24 lug 2024 3:32 • Ditto11 • Gli sviluppatori pensano non sia una buona idea o che il rapporto costo/benefici sia troppo alto:
So I was curious . and went over your game log ... I put every roll ... EVERY roll for both players into an excel and calculated their average .. # of 1's rolled (ie x's), and # of 6's rolled ...,
Here's the results:
Average of all rolls by each player:
Thee Cormorant: 3.519
Slaad nero: 3.219
# of rolls made total:
Thee Cormorant: 135
Slaad nero: 155
# of 1's (and x's) rolled:
Thee Cormorant: 25 (~ 18.52% of all rolls)
Slaad nero: 33 (~ 21.29% of all rolls)
# of 6's rolled:
Thee Cormorant: 26 (~19.26% of all rolls)
Slaad nero: 25 (~16.13% of all rolls).
Conclusion:
1) Averages are pretty spot on . in fact, looks like the other player rolled worse than you did.
2) you rolled about the same # of 1's and 6's ...
3) I noticed your "double x" turn .. and yes it sucks ... however, the turn before, AND the turn after, you rolled 3x 6's or 2x 6s and a 5 .. or such ... so those kinds of things happen both ways, and balance each other out.
4) game seems to be working perfectly fine within standard deviation probability statistics ... you had ONE unlucky round ... but failed to mention the really GOOD rounds you had ...
I would advise next time if you think you are being "cheated" .. to gather the evidence yourself and see what that statistics actually say ..., ;)
Good luck and have fun!
Here's the results:
Average of all rolls by each player:
Thee Cormorant: 3.519
Slaad nero: 3.219
# of rolls made total:
Thee Cormorant: 135
Slaad nero: 155
# of 1's (and x's) rolled:
Thee Cormorant: 25 (~ 18.52% of all rolls)
Slaad nero: 33 (~ 21.29% of all rolls)
# of 6's rolled:
Thee Cormorant: 26 (~19.26% of all rolls)
Slaad nero: 25 (~16.13% of all rolls).
Conclusion:
1) Averages are pretty spot on . in fact, looks like the other player rolled worse than you did.
2) you rolled about the same # of 1's and 6's ...
3) I noticed your "double x" turn .. and yes it sucks ... however, the turn before, AND the turn after, you rolled 3x 6's or 2x 6s and a 5 .. or such ... so those kinds of things happen both ways, and balance each other out.
4) game seems to be working perfectly fine within standard deviation probability statistics ... you had ONE unlucky round ... but failed to mention the really GOOD rounds you had ...
I would advise next time if you think you are being "cheated" .. to gather the evidence yourself and see what that statistics actually say ..., ;)
Good luck and have fun!
24 lug 2024 4:59 • Kayvon • Gli sviluppatori pensano non sia una buona idea o che il rapporto costo/benefici sia troppo alto:
Excellent analysis, Ditto! I wish there were a way to sticky your comment for all similar threads that appear with some regularity. Truly top-notch work.
Aggiungi qualcosa a questo report
Aggiungi qui tutto ciò che sembra pertinente per riprodurre questo bug o capire il tuo suggerimento:
- Un altro ID tavolo / ID mossa
- F5 ha risolto il problema?
- Il problema si verifica spesso? Ogni volta? Casualmente?
- Se hai una schermata di questo errore (cosa buona e giusta), puoi usare Imgur.com per caricarla e fare copia/incolla del link qui.
