• Per favore copia/incolla il messaggio di errore visualizzato sullo schermo, se possibile.

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• Per favore spiega cosa avresti voluto fare, cosa hai fatto e cosa è successo

End of game standings

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Per favore copia/incolla il testo visualizzato in inglese invece che nella tua lingua. Se hai uno screenshot di questo bug (è sempre buona norma farlo), usa un servizio di caricamento immagini a tua scelta (come snipboard.io) per caricarlo e copiare/incollare il link qui. Questo testo è disponibile nel sistema di traduzione? Se sì, è stato tradotto nell'arco di più di 24 ore?

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Spiega il tuo suggerimento in modo preciso e conciso in modo che sia il più semplice possibile per capire cosa intendi.

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Cosa era mostrato sullo schermo quando sei rimasto bloccato (schermo bianco? interfaccia di gioco parziale? messaggio di errore?)

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Quale parte delle regole non è stata rispettata dall'adattamento BGA

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• La violazione delle regole è visibile nel replay della partita? Se sì, a che numero di mossa?

End of game standings

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Qual era l'azione di gioco che volevi fare?

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• Cosa stai provando a fare per attivare questa azione di gioco?

End of game standings

• Cosa è successo quando hai provato a fare questo (messaggio di errore, messaggio nella barra di stato del gioco...)?

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• In quale fase del gioco si è verificato il problema (qual era l'istruzione della partita in corso)?

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• Cosa è successo quando hai provato a fare questa azione di gioco (messaggio di errore, messaggio nella barra di stato del gioco...)?

End of game standings

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Per favore descrivi il problema rilevato. Se hai uno screenshot di questo bug (è sempre buona norma farlo), usa un servizio di caricamento immagini a tua scelta (come snipboard.io) per caricarlo e copiare/incollare il link qui.

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Per favore copia/incolla il testo visualizzato in inglese invece che nella tua lingua. Se hai uno screenshot di questo bug (è sempre buona norma farlo), usa un servizio di caricamento immagini a tua scelta (come snipboard.io) per caricarlo e copiare/incollare il link qui. Questo testo è disponibile nel sistema di traduzione? Se sì, è stato tradotto nell'arco di più di 24 ore?

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Spiega il tuo suggerimento in modo preciso e conciso in modo che sia il più semplice possibile per capire cosa intendi.

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• Qual è il tuo browser?