• Per favore copia/incolla il messaggio di errore visualizzato sullo schermo, se possibile.

I've noticed that when the system calculates ELO ratings at the end of a game, I sometimes lose a few (or often less than one) points for tying with my partner. According to what I read, this appears to be because my partner has a lower ELO score than me and the system seems to think that I should therefore either finish the game with a higher score than my partner or else I will lose points. For example, in the last game I played, my ELO was about 165 before I started the game and my partner's was about 157. It indicates that because I tied with my partner, I then lost -0.15 points. The problem, of course, is that I can not possibly NOT tie with my partner, as we play as a team in Euchre. When I score points, they score points, and vice versa. I personally think it's kind of strange that all the players are calculated separately at all. For example, we won the game I mentioned earlier but I earned points separately for beating each individual opponent (and lost -0.15 for tying my partner). But, of course, the partners on the other team are playing together too, and they both collect points together. Would it make more sense to average out the two teammates scores and then calculate one team against the other team, instead of all as individuals?

Ultimately, in theory, if my partner has a lower ELO score than me than I am essentially teamed up with someone below my skill level and therefore this would make it even harder for me to win the game. This certainly does not sound to me like a situation where someone should lose points if they win the game. Thanks for everything, love this site :)

• Per favore spiega cosa avresti voluto fare, cosa hai fatto e cosa è successo

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Per favore copia/incolla il testo visualizzato in inglese invece che nella tua lingua. Se hai uno screenshot di questo bug (è sempre buona norma farlo), usa un servizio di caricamento immagini a tua scelta (come snipboard.io) per caricarlo e copiare/incollare il link qui. Questo testo è disponibile nel sistema di traduzione? Se sì, è stato tradotto nell'arco di più di 24 ore?

I've noticed that when the system calculates ELO ratings at the end of a game, I sometimes lose a few (or often less than one) points for tying with my partner. According to what I read, this appears to be because my partner has a lower ELO score than me and the system seems to think that I should therefore either finish the game with a higher score than my partner or else I will lose points. For example, in the last game I played, my ELO was about 165 before I started the game and my partner's was about 157. It indicates that because I tied with my partner, I then lost -0.15 points. The problem, of course, is that I can not possibly NOT tie with my partner, as we play as a team in Euchre. When I score points, they score points, and vice versa. I personally think it's kind of strange that all the players are calculated separately at all. For example, we won the game I mentioned earlier but I earned points separately for beating each individual opponent (and lost -0.15 for tying my partner). But, of course, the partners on the other team are playing together too, and they both collect points together. Would it make more sense to average out the two teammates scores and then calculate one team against the other team, instead of all as individuals?

Ultimately, in theory, if my partner has a lower ELO score than me than I am essentially teamed up with someone below my skill level and therefore this would make it even harder for me to win the game. This certainly does not sound to me like a situation where someone should lose points if they win the game. Thanks for everything, love this site :)

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Spiega il tuo suggerimento in modo preciso e conciso in modo che sia il più semplice possibile per capire cosa intendi.

I've noticed that when the system calculates ELO ratings at the end of a game, I sometimes lose a few (or often less than one) points for tying with my partner. According to what I read, this appears to be because my partner has a lower ELO score than me and the system seems to think that I should therefore either finish the game with a higher score than my partner or else I will lose points. For example, in the last game I played, my ELO was about 165 before I started the game and my partner's was about 157. It indicates that because I tied with my partner, I then lost -0.15 points. The problem, of course, is that I can not possibly NOT tie with my partner, as we play as a team in Euchre. When I score points, they score points, and vice versa. I personally think it's kind of strange that all the players are calculated separately at all. For example, we won the game I mentioned earlier but I earned points separately for beating each individual opponent (and lost -0.15 for tying my partner). But, of course, the partners on the other team are playing together too, and they both collect points together. Would it make more sense to average out the two teammates scores and then calculate one team against the other team, instead of all as individuals?

Ultimately, in theory, if my partner has a lower ELO score than me than I am essentially teamed up with someone below my skill level and therefore this would make it even harder for me to win the game. This certainly does not sound to me like a situation where someone should lose points if they win the game. Thanks for everything, love this site :)

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Cosa era mostrato sullo schermo quando sei rimasto bloccato (schermo bianco? interfaccia di gioco parziale? messaggio di errore?)

I've noticed that when the system calculates ELO ratings at the end of a game, I sometimes lose a few (or often less than one) points for tying with my partner. According to what I read, this appears to be because my partner has a lower ELO score than me and the system seems to think that I should therefore either finish the game with a higher score than my partner or else I will lose points. For example, in the last game I played, my ELO was about 165 before I started the game and my partner's was about 157. It indicates that because I tied with my partner, I then lost -0.15 points. The problem, of course, is that I can not possibly NOT tie with my partner, as we play as a team in Euchre. When I score points, they score points, and vice versa. I personally think it's kind of strange that all the players are calculated separately at all. For example, we won the game I mentioned earlier but I earned points separately for beating each individual opponent (and lost -0.15 for tying my partner). But, of course, the partners on the other team are playing together too, and they both collect points together. Would it make more sense to average out the two teammates scores and then calculate one team against the other team, instead of all as individuals?

Ultimately, in theory, if my partner has a lower ELO score than me than I am essentially teamed up with someone below my skill level and therefore this would make it even harder for me to win the game. This certainly does not sound to me like a situation where someone should lose points if they win the game. Thanks for everything, love this site :)

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Quale parte delle regole non è stata rispettata dall'adattamento BGA

I've noticed that when the system calculates ELO ratings at the end of a game, I sometimes lose a few (or often less than one) points for tying with my partner. According to what I read, this appears to be because my partner has a lower ELO score than me and the system seems to think that I should therefore either finish the game with a higher score than my partner or else I will lose points. For example, in the last game I played, my ELO was about 165 before I started the game and my partner's was about 157. It indicates that because I tied with my partner, I then lost -0.15 points. The problem, of course, is that I can not possibly NOT tie with my partner, as we play as a team in Euchre. When I score points, they score points, and vice versa. I personally think it's kind of strange that all the players are calculated separately at all. For example, we won the game I mentioned earlier but I earned points separately for beating each individual opponent (and lost -0.15 for tying my partner). But, of course, the partners on the other team are playing together too, and they both collect points together. Would it make more sense to average out the two teammates scores and then calculate one team against the other team, instead of all as individuals?

Ultimately, in theory, if my partner has a lower ELO score than me than I am essentially teamed up with someone below my skill level and therefore this would make it even harder for me to win the game. This certainly does not sound to me like a situation where someone should lose points if they win the game. Thanks for everything, love this site :)

• La violazione delle regole è visibile nel replay della partita? Se sì, a che numero di mossa?

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Qual era l'azione di gioco che volevi fare?

I've noticed that when the system calculates ELO ratings at the end of a game, I sometimes lose a few (or often less than one) points for tying with my partner. According to what I read, this appears to be because my partner has a lower ELO score than me and the system seems to think that I should therefore either finish the game with a higher score than my partner or else I will lose points. For example, in the last game I played, my ELO was about 165 before I started the game and my partner's was about 157. It indicates that because I tied with my partner, I then lost -0.15 points. The problem, of course, is that I can not possibly NOT tie with my partner, as we play as a team in Euchre. When I score points, they score points, and vice versa. I personally think it's kind of strange that all the players are calculated separately at all. For example, we won the game I mentioned earlier but I earned points separately for beating each individual opponent (and lost -0.15 for tying my partner). But, of course, the partners on the other team are playing together too, and they both collect points together. Would it make more sense to average out the two teammates scores and then calculate one team against the other team, instead of all as individuals?

Ultimately, in theory, if my partner has a lower ELO score than me than I am essentially teamed up with someone below my skill level and therefore this would make it even harder for me to win the game. This certainly does not sound to me like a situation where someone should lose points if they win the game. Thanks for everything, love this site :)

• Cosa stai provando a fare per attivare questa azione di gioco?

• Cosa è successo quando hai provato a fare questo (messaggio di errore, messaggio nella barra di stato del gioco...)?

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• In quale fase del gioco si è verificato il problema (qual era l'istruzione della partita in corso)?

I've noticed that when the system calculates ELO ratings at the end of a game, I sometimes lose a few (or often less than one) points for tying with my partner. According to what I read, this appears to be because my partner has a lower ELO score than me and the system seems to think that I should therefore either finish the game with a higher score than my partner or else I will lose points. For example, in the last game I played, my ELO was about 165 before I started the game and my partner's was about 157. It indicates that because I tied with my partner, I then lost -0.15 points. The problem, of course, is that I can not possibly NOT tie with my partner, as we play as a team in Euchre. When I score points, they score points, and vice versa. I personally think it's kind of strange that all the players are calculated separately at all. For example, we won the game I mentioned earlier but I earned points separately for beating each individual opponent (and lost -0.15 for tying my partner). But, of course, the partners on the other team are playing together too, and they both collect points together. Would it make more sense to average out the two teammates scores and then calculate one team against the other team, instead of all as individuals?

Ultimately, in theory, if my partner has a lower ELO score than me than I am essentially teamed up with someone below my skill level and therefore this would make it even harder for me to win the game. This certainly does not sound to me like a situation where someone should lose points if they win the game. Thanks for everything, love this site :)

• Cosa è successo quando hai provato a fare questa azione di gioco (messaggio di errore, messaggio nella barra di stato del gioco...)?

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Per favore descrivi il problema rilevato. Se hai uno screenshot di questo bug (è sempre buona norma farlo), usa un servizio di caricamento immagini a tua scelta (come snipboard.io) per caricarlo e copiare/incollare il link qui.

I've noticed that when the system calculates ELO ratings at the end of a game, I sometimes lose a few (or often less than one) points for tying with my partner. According to what I read, this appears to be because my partner has a lower ELO score than me and the system seems to think that I should therefore either finish the game with a higher score than my partner or else I will lose points. For example, in the last game I played, my ELO was about 165 before I started the game and my partner's was about 157. It indicates that because I tied with my partner, I then lost -0.15 points. The problem, of course, is that I can not possibly NOT tie with my partner, as we play as a team in Euchre. When I score points, they score points, and vice versa. I personally think it's kind of strange that all the players are calculated separately at all. For example, we won the game I mentioned earlier but I earned points separately for beating each individual opponent (and lost -0.15 for tying my partner). But, of course, the partners on the other team are playing together too, and they both collect points together. Would it make more sense to average out the two teammates scores and then calculate one team against the other team, instead of all as individuals?

Ultimately, in theory, if my partner has a lower ELO score than me than I am essentially teamed up with someone below my skill level and therefore this would make it even harder for me to win the game. This certainly does not sound to me like a situation where someone should lose points if they win the game. Thanks for everything, love this site :)

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Per favore copia/incolla il testo visualizzato in inglese invece che nella tua lingua. Se hai uno screenshot di questo bug (è sempre buona norma farlo), usa un servizio di caricamento immagini a tua scelta (come snipboard.io) per caricarlo e copiare/incollare il link qui. Questo testo è disponibile nel sistema di traduzione? Se sì, è stato tradotto nell'arco di più di 24 ore?

I've noticed that when the system calculates ELO ratings at the end of a game, I sometimes lose a few (or often less than one) points for tying with my partner. According to what I read, this appears to be because my partner has a lower ELO score than me and the system seems to think that I should therefore either finish the game with a higher score than my partner or else I will lose points. For example, in the last game I played, my ELO was about 165 before I started the game and my partner's was about 157. It indicates that because I tied with my partner, I then lost -0.15 points. The problem, of course, is that I can not possibly NOT tie with my partner, as we play as a team in Euchre. When I score points, they score points, and vice versa. I personally think it's kind of strange that all the players are calculated separately at all. For example, we won the game I mentioned earlier but I earned points separately for beating each individual opponent (and lost -0.15 for tying my partner). But, of course, the partners on the other team are playing together too, and they both collect points together. Would it make more sense to average out the two teammates scores and then calculate one team against the other team, instead of all as individuals?

Ultimately, in theory, if my partner has a lower ELO score than me than I am essentially teamed up with someone below my skill level and therefore this would make it even harder for me to win the game. This certainly does not sound to me like a situation where someone should lose points if they win the game. Thanks for everything, love this site :)

• Qual è il tuo browser?

• Spiega il tuo suggerimento in modo preciso e conciso in modo che sia il più semplice possibile per capire cosa intendi.

I've noticed that when the system calculates ELO ratings at the end of a game, I sometimes lose a few (or often less than one) points for tying with my partner. According to what I read, this appears to be because my partner has a lower ELO score than me and the system seems to think that I should therefore either finish the game with a higher score than my partner or else I will lose points. For example, in the last game I played, my ELO was about 165 before I started the game and my partner's was about 157. It indicates that because I tied with my partner, I then lost -0.15 points. The problem, of course, is that I can not possibly NOT tie with my partner, as we play as a team in Euchre. When I score points, they score points, and vice versa. I personally think it's kind of strange that all the players are calculated separately at all. For example, we won the game I mentioned earlier but I earned points separately for beating each individual opponent (and lost -0.15 for tying my partner). But, of course, the partners on the other team are playing together too, and they both collect points together. Would it make more sense to average out the two teammates scores and then calculate one team against the other team, instead of all as individuals?

Ultimately, in theory, if my partner has a lower ELO score than me than I am essentially teamed up with someone below my skill level and therefore this would make it even harder for me to win the game. This certainly does not sound to me like a situation where someone should lose points if they win the game. Thanks for everything, love this site :)

• Qual è il tuo browser?